The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
A code card for Pokémon TCG Live
。关于这个话题，im钱包官方下载提供了深入分析
3014272510http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/28/content_30142725.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/28/content_30142725.html11921 让乡亲声音听得见、有回应（实干显担当 同心启新程·代表委员履职故事）
Силовые структуры